cw-#lak12
This week’s topic was one that I was looking forward to and think is most important. It is was however also the week where I had the least time to devote to the activities and readings and am thus trying to create a list of issues and questions that I want to go back to:
In the Aspen report the three questions raised are ones that I will want to follow up on:
· Do huge datasets and advanced correlation techniques mean we no longer need to rely on hypothesis in scientific inquiry?
• When does “now-casting,” the search through massive amounts of aggregated data to estimate individual behavior, go over the line of personal privacy?
• How will healthcare companies and insurers use the correlations of aggregated health behaviors in addressing the future care of patients?
Why am I not surprised that the most attention was received as big data applies to financial markets and risks there?
I did like Bollier’s (2010) description thought: “Computing has become ubiquitous, creating countless new digital puddles, lakes, tributaries and oceans of information” (p.1).
Key words:
· - Real-time decision making tool
· - Teasing out potentially useful patterns
· - Petabites have 15 zeros
· ... imperil personal privacy, civil liberties and consumer freedoms
· - Visualization of data and other data cleaning choices
· - Now-casts
· - “The benefits of personalization tend to accrue to businesses but the harms are inflicted on dispersed and unorganized individuals, Taipale noted” (p. 23).
· - “smart mobs” demonstrate the ability of non-commercial actors to influence trends
· - Science Commons
· - “securitize” people’s health
· - Data integrity
Boyd & Crawford was a good read:
· - analysis conducted only at a fixed point in time
· - possiblity to de-anonymize parts of the dataset
· - accountability is a multi-directional relationship
· - the “difference between being in public and being public” (boyd & Crawford, 2011, p. 12)
· - “While institutional inequalities may be a forgone conclusion in academia, they should nevertheless be examined and questioned. They produce a bias in the data and the types of research that emerge” (p. 13).
I liked the Times multimedia options for the resources this week. Yes, the power of habit...
Yesterday I watched a video interview with George where he explained the difference between complicated and complex: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qesp9b2w_aY
I liked the meeting with Erik Duval and his insight and European perspective.